l***@gmx.com
2011-10-11 02:55:40 UTC
Illinois as of January 1 of 2010, implemented the first law in the
State of Illinois that extended protections from stalking by other
than physical violence and contact, and from persons the victim did
not have a relationship to.
Illinois being a very backward state on the topic, other states having
generalized restraining orders laws that are used to keep the peace,
which Illinois has no interest in whatsoever.
Despite the general damage infliction in Illinois in enormous
aggregate amounts from harassment, fraud, malicious mischief, and the
long list of crimes that in a recent popular Republican backlash
often typified by Michelle Bachman and her godly husband who even
directed what she did for a living.
Which the rest of us don't want in an elected official. Who when
elected, is instead obeying her husband, who the voters did not elect.
Well, the Republican backlash angered at what they see as "attention"
for the rest of us, who they demand be restricted to the protections
of only the categories of offenses which are subject to the Domestic
Protection order law in IL, ie, sexual assault that is accompanied by
physical stalking only.
Stated to be because "that is how we think of stalking" with complete
disregard for the statutes, claimed to be a "matter of interpretation"
by the judicial who have taken that position to the point of formal
brochures on the subject restricting the law to stalking involving
sexual assault for the most part.
To the point that the Republican judicial backlash against the
legislature on the subject they oppose of extending stalking
protections to other than direct physical acts of stalking,
specifically what the law was passed to terminate, which they continue
by the same methods that the Patriot Movement has continued to direct
at gun control.
Which is what they see as civil disobedience that is causing enormous
and violent endangerment of the majority by the what in a regulated
system is the insubordinate refusal to operate a court in accordance
to state and federal law.
Which has been argued is the case for other reasons, due to the for
example, the general malicious damage infliction the courts are used
for furthering outlawed political agendas directed at classes of
people.
But the Michelle Bachman followers in the judicial have made it clear
they are enraged at and will not enforce the Illinois Nondomestic
Stalking law other than extending the domestic protections from sexual
assault to nondomestic rapists.
As persons issuing other threats about doing so to a public that
cannot access the courts due to the retaliating and political rage
expressed with court activity the law does not permit used for this
purpose, but has become very popular to do in a climate dominated by
the Tea Party inciting this kind of conduct with law enforcement in
general, and threatening to turn the country into a civil war doing
so.
As it effects commerce brutally due to the risks involved in doing
business with persons who have made the law into a civil war of what
they will and will not enforce, insubordinately to the court system
as a whole which does not grant that option.
As it clearly does not grant that option to police.
But the clock has been set back 100 years, to make the public aware
that our judicial in Illinois do not have to comply with state and
federal law any more, and that the public without regulatory
protections, has nothing they can do about it.
We no longer have majority rule in America, e
State of Illinois that extended protections from stalking by other
than physical violence and contact, and from persons the victim did
not have a relationship to.
Illinois being a very backward state on the topic, other states having
generalized restraining orders laws that are used to keep the peace,
which Illinois has no interest in whatsoever.
Despite the general damage infliction in Illinois in enormous
aggregate amounts from harassment, fraud, malicious mischief, and the
long list of crimes that in a recent popular Republican backlash
often typified by Michelle Bachman and her godly husband who even
directed what she did for a living.
Which the rest of us don't want in an elected official. Who when
elected, is instead obeying her husband, who the voters did not elect.
Well, the Republican backlash angered at what they see as "attention"
for the rest of us, who they demand be restricted to the protections
of only the categories of offenses which are subject to the Domestic
Protection order law in IL, ie, sexual assault that is accompanied by
physical stalking only.
Stated to be because "that is how we think of stalking" with complete
disregard for the statutes, claimed to be a "matter of interpretation"
by the judicial who have taken that position to the point of formal
brochures on the subject restricting the law to stalking involving
sexual assault for the most part.
To the point that the Republican judicial backlash against the
legislature on the subject they oppose of extending stalking
protections to other than direct physical acts of stalking,
specifically what the law was passed to terminate, which they continue
by the same methods that the Patriot Movement has continued to direct
at gun control.
Which is what they see as civil disobedience that is causing enormous
and violent endangerment of the majority by the what in a regulated
system is the insubordinate refusal to operate a court in accordance
to state and federal law.
Which has been argued is the case for other reasons, due to the for
example, the general malicious damage infliction the courts are used
for furthering outlawed political agendas directed at classes of
people.
But the Michelle Bachman followers in the judicial have made it clear
they are enraged at and will not enforce the Illinois Nondomestic
Stalking law other than extending the domestic protections from sexual
assault to nondomestic rapists.
As persons issuing other threats about doing so to a public that
cannot access the courts due to the retaliating and political rage
expressed with court activity the law does not permit used for this
purpose, but has become very popular to do in a climate dominated by
the Tea Party inciting this kind of conduct with law enforcement in
general, and threatening to turn the country into a civil war doing
so.
As it effects commerce brutally due to the risks involved in doing
business with persons who have made the law into a civil war of what
they will and will not enforce, insubordinately to the court system
as a whole which does not grant that option.
As it clearly does not grant that option to police.
But the clock has been set back 100 years, to make the public aware
that our judicial in Illinois do not have to comply with state and
federal law any more, and that the public without regulatory
protections, has nothing they can do about it.
We no longer have majority rule in America, e