Discussion:
you couldn't make it up
(too old to reply)
thedarkman
2011-06-05 21:20:39 UTC
Permalink
weird pervert burglar


Turk182
2011-06-05 21:35:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by thedarkman
weird pervert burglar
http://youtu.be/y9ygZ58bPuw
Scary, but poor man. There you have a child who was screwed up.

Turk182
Nigel Oldfield
2011-06-06 09:41:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by thedarkman
weird pervert burglar
http://youtu.be/y9ygZ58bPuw
Scary, but poor man.  There you have a child who was screwed up.
Turk182
Seems happy enough to me, until the law kicked in.

WM
John
2011-06-06 10:45:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Turk182
Post by thedarkman
weird pervert burglar
http://youtu.be/y9ygZ58bPuw
Scary, but poor man. There you have a child who was screwed up.
Turk182
The only screw up is that he broke into a house. Nothing wrong with being a
crossdresser, he should just have bought his own clothes instead of breaking
into someone's house for theirs.
Ian Jackson
2011-06-06 12:26:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by John
Post by Turk182
Post by thedarkman
weird pervert burglar
http://youtu.be/y9ygZ58bPuw
Scary, but poor man. There you have a child who was screwed up.
Turk182
The only screw up is that he broke into a house. Nothing wrong with being a
crossdresser, he should just have bought his own clothes instead of breaking
into someone's house for theirs.
His eight year sentence (seemingly because he actually stole the video
camera) does seem rather harsh. Apart from that, he actually didn't
actually do any physical harm to anyone. I suspect that he was really
sentenced on the basis of what he could have done, or what he might try
to do in the future.
--
Ian
F Murtz
2011-06-07 02:51:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by John
Post by thedarkman
weird pervert burglar
http://youtu.be/y9ygZ58bPuw
Scary, but poor man. There you have a child who was screwed up.
Turk182
The only screw up is that he broke into a house. Nothing wrong with being a
crossdresser, he should just have bought his own clothes instead of breaking
into someone's house for theirs.
His eight year sentence (seemingly because he actually stole the video
camera) does seem rather harsh. Apart from that, he actually didn't
actually do any physical harm to anyone. I suspect that he was really
sentenced on the basis of what he could have done, or what he might try
to do in the future.
They probably did make it up.
Why is all the action right in front of the camera with all the clothing
accessible right in the same position?

Loading...