Vicegerent
2007-04-05 19:44:48 UTC
From:
http://www.irs.gov/irb/2005-14_IRB/ar13.html
DISCUSSION OF THE "STRAW MAN" CLAIM
The "straw man" claim is premised on the erroneous
theory that most government documents do not
actually refer to individuals. Users of the "straw man"
theory falsely claim that only documents using an
individual's name with "standard" capitalization, i.e.,
lower-case with only the beginning letters of each
name capitalized, are legitimate. These individuals
erroneously argue that the use of the individual's
name in all upper-case letters, which is common
in some government documents, refers to a separate
legal entity, called a "straw man." These individuals
also erroneously argue that, as a result of the creation
of a "straw man," they are not liable for the debts,
including the tax debts, of their "straw man," that
taxing the "straw man" is illegal because the "straw
man" is a debt instrument based upon the labor of a
real person and is, therefore, a form of slavery, or
that no tax is owed by the real individual because
it can be satisfied, or offset, by money in a "Treasury
Direct Account" held in the name of the "straw man."
This is a 'We want you to assume, so that we can screw
you.' term. "individual" what? In Canada, the Income tax
act says that ''individual' is a PERSON, other than a
corporation. All 'persons' are fictional characters,
constructs of man, or, fictional status of 'slave' imposed
upon a human..
the family name paramount, and the given names
as referential names which is the 'fictional strawman'.
The case used in spelling is immaterial as to whether
it is a 'strawman name' or not. A normal human
'nickname' has the 'given names' as being paramount,
and the 'family/surname' as a reference name to
the given names. However, in reality, we are never
in a a position in life to 'accept' (contract law)
'given names', so it is a fact that no adult human
has a name in any 'legal sense'.
states that 'all persons are subject to paying the income
tax. Similar statements can be found in the Title 26 IRC.
Therefore, it would be erroneous to state that a 'person'
(individual) could claim that another fiction associated
with a fiction could claim to not be liable for the claimed
debt. However, a free will human is not a 'person', and
thus not an individual, as used in the IRC, and thus
is NOT liable for any debts the State imposed upon
its own property - the strawman name.
of servitude - a false and fictional slave status. Since
the 'assumed to be' human slave is in fact, a free will
man or woman duped/defrauded into that false
slave status, then it becomes 'involuntary servitude'
by way of fraud. The only way the IRS can make
this assumption stick is by defrauding a man or
woman into accepting that they are an 'individual'
or 'citizen(slave)'.
does not use it. Again, the term 'individual'.
In summation, this IRS webpage has absolutely
nothing on it which has anything to do with
Eldon's $0.00 Tax Owing filing method for
an IRS 1040 or CRA T1
http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm
Vicegerent
http://www.irs.gov/irb/2005-14_IRB/ar13.html
DISCUSSION OF THE "STRAW MAN" CLAIM
The "straw man" claim is premised on the erroneous
theory that most government documents do not
actually refer to individuals. Users of the "straw man"
theory falsely claim that only documents using an
individual's name with "standard" capitalization, i.e.,
lower-case with only the beginning letters of each
name capitalized, are legitimate. These individuals
erroneously argue that the use of the individual's
name in all upper-case letters, which is common
in some government documents, refers to a separate
legal entity, called a "straw man." These individuals
also erroneously argue that, as a result of the creation
of a "straw man," they are not liable for the debts,
including the tax debts, of their "straw man," that
taxing the "straw man" is illegal because the "straw
man" is a debt instrument based upon the labor of a
real person and is, therefore, a form of slavery, or
that no tax is owed by the real individual because
it can be satisfied, or offset, by money in a "Treasury
Direct Account" held in the name of the "straw man."
DISCUSSION OF THE "STRAW MAN" CLAIM
The "straw man" claim is premised on the erroneous
theory that most government documents do not actually
refer to individuals.
Comment) "Individual" is nowhere defined in Title 26 IRC.The "straw man" claim is premised on the erroneous
theory that most government documents do not actually
refer to individuals.
This is a 'We want you to assume, so that we can screw
you.' term. "individual" what? In Canada, the Income tax
act says that ''individual' is a PERSON, other than a
corporation. All 'persons' are fictional characters,
constructs of man, or, fictional status of 'slave' imposed
upon a human..
Users of the "straw man" theory falsely claim that only
documents using an individual's name with "standard"
capitalization, i.e., lower-case with only the beginning
letters of each name capitalized, are legitimate.
These individuals erroneously argue that the use of the
individual's name in all upper-case letters, which is
common in some government documents, refers to a
separate legal entity, called a "straw man."
Comment: Eldon shows in his program that it isdocuments using an individual's name with "standard"
capitalization, i.e., lower-case with only the beginning
letters of each name capitalized, are legitimate.
These individuals erroneously argue that the use of the
individual's name in all upper-case letters, which is
common in some government documents, refers to a
separate legal entity, called a "straw man."
the family name paramount, and the given names
as referential names which is the 'fictional strawman'.
The case used in spelling is immaterial as to whether
it is a 'strawman name' or not. A normal human
'nickname' has the 'given names' as being paramount,
and the 'family/surname' as a reference name to
the given names. However, in reality, we are never
in a a position in life to 'accept' (contract law)
'given names', so it is a fact that no adult human
has a name in any 'legal sense'.
These individuals also erroneously argue that, as a result
of the creation of a "straw man," they are not liable for the
debts, including the tax debts, of their "straw man,"
Comment) The Canadian income tax act. section 2,of the creation of a "straw man," they are not liable for the
debts, including the tax debts, of their "straw man,"
states that 'all persons are subject to paying the income
tax. Similar statements can be found in the Title 26 IRC.
Therefore, it would be erroneous to state that a 'person'
(individual) could claim that another fiction associated
with a fiction could claim to not be liable for the claimed
debt. However, a free will human is not a 'person', and
thus not an individual, as used in the IRC, and thus
is NOT liable for any debts the State imposed upon
its own property - the strawman name.
that taxing the "straw man" is illegal because the "straw
man" is a debt instrument based upon the labor of a real
person and is, therefore, a form of slavery,
Comment) A 'real person' is a human under contractman" is a debt instrument based upon the labor of a real
person and is, therefore, a form of slavery,
of servitude - a false and fictional slave status. Since
the 'assumed to be' human slave is in fact, a free will
man or woman duped/defrauded into that false
slave status, then it becomes 'involuntary servitude'
by way of fraud. The only way the IRS can make
this assumption stick is by defrauding a man or
woman into accepting that they are an 'individual'
or 'citizen(slave)'.
or that no tax is owed by the real individual because
it can be satisfied, or offset, by money in a "Treasury
Direct Account" held in the name of the "straw man."
Comment) Some assume this tactic, but Eldonit can be satisfied, or offset, by money in a "Treasury
Direct Account" held in the name of the "straw man."
does not use it. Again, the term 'individual'.
In summation, this IRS webpage has absolutely
nothing on it which has anything to do with
Eldon's $0.00 Tax Owing filing method for
an IRS 1040 or CRA T1
http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm
Vicegerent