Atheists illegally forge the research data of ARIS - The dysfunctional world of atheist fantasies and insane self-delusion Re: Oops, more demise - only 491 posts in 48 hours

[fasgnadh]

Virgil is alt.atheism's lying delusional post forging Chumpion:

It is sad to see the degree to which delusional atheists are
completely out of touch with reality.

Their SpokesOrc, Virgil the forger, demonstrates the degree to
which their fragile world of fantasy is built on lies. Their belief,
based on such New Age nonsense as 'the Secret', is that if they

#

ARIS will be notified that atheists are taking their valid and
respected research and fabricating it in a demonstration of the
intellectual and moral bankruptcy that is militant atheism.

Their organisation's good name and reputation has been violated by
despicable atheist liars and their data has been massively forged
and misrepresented. The militant atheists, and especially their
chief propagandist in alt.atheism, Virgil, had better have deep
pockets because this fabrication is actionable in numerous jurisdictions;

# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008 % increase
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 34,169,000 15.88%
#
# Religious 167,254,000 182,198,000 8.93%
#
# Agnostics 991,000 1,985,000 100.30%
#
# Atheists 902,000 1,621,000 79.71%
#

As usual, the atheist propaganda machine's criminal deception omits
proper attribution, they do not want people to be able to check the
source and discover the fraud the atheists are attempting to perpetrate.

Here is the real data, properly attributed, including a link to the
primary source;


# American Religious Identification Survey, Summary Report March 2009:
#
# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%)
#
# Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%)
#
# Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%)
#
# Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%)


0.7% of Americans!! B^D 2.3% worldwide!!! B^D


No wonder the atheists are desperate to LIE about reality with their
feeble fabrications!

EVEN THE AGNOSTICS BEAT YOU!!! **AND** they grew FASTER!!!! B^D


Atheists are a mere 4% of non-believers
..96% of non-believers explicitly reject atheism!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/documents/aris030609.pdf


Atheist liars simply can not be trusted, they are not merely immoral and
unethical defectives, but engage in criminal behaviour as has been
exposed above.
--
alt.atheism FAQ:

http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com/


http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/7c0978c14fd4ed37?hl=en&dmode=source




"Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8295?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8290?context=latest


"Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:6348?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17478?context=latest


"How can you make a revolution without firing squads?"
- Lenin

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17475?context=latest

Loading Image...


Loading Image...

[Virgil]

Post by fasgnadh
It is sad to see the degree to which delusional atheists are
completely out of touch with reality.
Their SpokesOrc, Virgil the forger, demonstrates the degree to
which their fragile world of fantasy is built on lies. Their belief,
based on such New Age nonsense as 'the Secret', is that if they

#

ARIS will be notified that atheists are taking their valid and
respected research and fabricating it in a demonstration of the
intellectual and moral bankruptcy that is militant atheism.

Anyone with a moducum of arithmetic can verify that given
the complete report which says in aprt
<quote>
# American Religious Identification Survey, Summary Report March 2009:
#
# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%)
#
# Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%)
#
# Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%)
#
# Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%)
#

<unquote>

Post by fasgnadh

# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008 % increase
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 34,169,000 15.88%
#
# Religious 167,254,000 182,198,000 8.93%
#
# Agnostics 991,000 1,985,000 100.30%
#
# Atheists 902,000 1,621,000 79.71%

I.e, that 34,169,000 is 15.88% larger than 29,481,000, and so on.

Post by fasgnadh
As usual, the atheist propaganda machine's

That alleged "propaganda machine" merely calculates the correct percent
increases, rounded to two decimal places, and posts them.

I challenge Fasgnadh the futile to calculate those percent increases
from the actual ARIS data for himself and post them, if he regards mine
as so incorrect.

Post by fasgnadh
Here is the real data, properly attributed, including a link to the
primary source;
#
# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%)
#
# Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%)
#
# Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%)
#
# Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%)

Note that the ARIS data actual numbers that Fasgnadh refers to are
exactly the ones I used in my calculations, and which you can verify
for yourselves.

One of them is fairly trivial: the agnostic have clearly MORE than
doubled their numbers from 2001 t0 2008, so have an INCREASE of more
than 100%

Post by fasgnadh
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/documents/aris030609.pdf

Theist liars like fasgnadh simply can not be trusted, they are not
merely immoral and unethical defectives, but engage in criminal slander
as has been exposed above. The canlculations I made correctly derive
from figures that Fasgnadh himself provides

Note, for those less ignorant and stupidly arrogant than Fasgnadh, the
formula for percent-increase is

NewValue divided by OldValue times 100 is new as % of old
then take away the original 100% to get only the % increase

Such formulae are quite beyond Fasgnadh's capacity, which is why he has
his drawers in such a knot.

[Paladin]

Post by Virgil

Post by fasgnadh
It is sad to see the degree to which delusional atheists are
completely out of touch with reality.
Their SpokesOrc, Virgil the forger, demonstrates the degree to
which their fragile world of fantasy is built on lies. Their belief,
based on such New Age nonsense as 'the Secret', is that if they

#

ARIS will be notified that atheists are taking their valid and
respected research and fabricating it in a demonstration of the
intellectual and moral bankruptcy that is militant atheism.

Anyone with a moducum of arithmetic can verify that given
the complete report which says in aprt
<quote>
#
# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%)
#
# Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%)
#
# Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%)
#
# Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%)
#
<unquote>

Post by fasgnadh

# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008 % increase
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 34,169,000 15.88%
#
# Religious 167,254,000 182,198,000 8.93%
#
# Agnostics 991,000 1,985,000 100.30%
#
# Atheists 902,000 1,621,000 79.71%

I.e, that 34,169,000 is 15.88% larger than 29,481,000, and so on.

Post by fasgnadh
As usual, the atheist propaganda machine's

That alleged "propaganda machine" merely calculates the correct percent
increases, rounded to two decimal places, and posts them.
I challenge Fasgnadh the futile to calculate those percent increases
from the actual ARIS data for himself and post them, if he regards mine
as so incorrect.

Post by fasgnadh
Here is the real data, properly attributed, including a link to the
primary source;
#
# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%)
#
# Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%)
#
# Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%)
#
# Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%)

Note that the ARIS data actual numbers that Fasgnadh refers to are
exactly the ones I used in my calculations, and which you can verify
for yourselves.
One of them is fairly trivial: the agnostic have clearly MORE than
doubled their numbers from 2001 t0 2008, so have an INCREASE of more
than 100%

Post by fasgnadh
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/documents/aris030609.pdf

Theist liars like fasgnadh simply can not be trusted, they are not
merely immoral and unethical defectives, but engage in criminal slander
as has been exposed above. The canlculations I made correctly derive
from figures that Fasgnadh himself provides
Note, for those less ignorant and stupidly arrogant than Fasgnadh, the
formula for percent-increase is
NewValue divided by OldValue times 100 is new as % of old
then take away the original 100% to get only the % increase
Such formulae are quite beyond Fasgnadh's capacity, which is why he has
his drawers in such a knot.

They are so militant in defense of religion because
their own faith is so damned weak. And they're afraid
that--if there is a god--she'll be really pissed at the
doubt hidden in their "souls."

[fasgnadh]

You're a lying sack of shit, liar pedophile earl.

Of *course* he is!

I have never seen any evidence that Duke is a paedophile.

This is an extremely serious accusation and I want to know if
it refers to a past conviction, or if the atheist accusers
have presented any evidence of their claims to the police, or
if they are lying slanderers.

In the words of every atheist hypocrite on the planet;

"Where's the PROOF?"

If there is no proof the lie is actionable in almost every jurisdiction
in which USENET propagates and the damages would be well worth the legal
cost, which the atheists would have to pay.

I am sure there are numerous supporters of the Church who would
be happy to enforce the protection of innocence if the atheist
accusations are false.

especially when it's a completely fabricated non-topic.

Unless you have proof, that refers to YOUR post!

Budikka

--
alt.atheism FAQ:

http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com/


http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/7c0978c14fd4ed37?hl=en&dmode=source




"Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8295?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8290?context=latest


"Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:6348?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17478?context=latest


"How can you make a revolution without firing squads?"
- Lenin

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17475?context=latest

http://www.c96trading.com/Nagant_NKVD_300h.jpg


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01001/Tsar-family_1001874c.jpg

[invinoveritas]

Post by fasgnadh
"Where's the PROOF?"

Now, now fassy. You are just about the last person on this NG who can
supply any proof.

Maybe you misspelled POOF?

Good luck to you..

[fasgnadh]

Post by invinoveritas

Post by fasgnadh

You're a lying sack of shit, liar pedophile earl.

Of *course* he is!

I have never seen any evidence that Duke is a paedophile.
This is an extremely serious accusation and I want to know if
it refers to a past conviction, or if the atheist accusers
have presented any evidence of their claims to the police, or
if they are lying slanderers.
In the words of every atheist hypocrite on the planet;
"Where's the PROOF?"
If there is no proof the lie is actionable in almost every jurisdiction
in which USENET propagates and the damages would be well worth the legal
cost, which the atheists would have to pay.
I am sure there are numerous supporters of the Church who would
be happy to enforce the protection of innocence if the atheist
accusations are false.

especially when it's a completely fabricated non-topic.

Unless you have proof, that refers to YOUR post!

Budikka

You are just about the last person on this NG who can
supply any proof.

I don't have to 'supply any proof', you poor demented atheist
imbecile, because it's not me that has falsely accused
Duke of paedophilia, it is your lying militant atheist
accomplices in slander who have committed that heinous act..


Are you coming out of the closet?

Post by invinoveritas
Good luck to you..

Good luck to the lawyers who have to defend LYING ATHEIST SCUM,
you nest of slandering shitpigs!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAAA
--
alt.atheism FAQ:

http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com/


http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/7c0978c14fd4ed37?hl=en&dmode=source




"Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8295?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8290?context=latest


"Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:6348?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17478?context=latest


"How can you make a revolution without firing squads?"
- Lenin

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17475?context=latest

http://www.c96trading.com/Nagant_NKVD_300h.jpg


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01001/Tsar-family_1001874c.jpg

[invinoveritas]

Post by fasgnadh

You're a lying sack of shit, liar pedophile earl.

You are just about the last person on this NG who can supply any proof.

I don't have to 'supply any proof', you poor demented atheist
imbecile, because it's not me that has falsely accused
Duke of paedophilia, it is your lying militant atheist
accomplices in slander who have committed that heinous act..
Are you coming out of the closet?
Good luck to the lawyers who have to defend LYING ATHEIST SCUM,
you nest of slandering shitpigs!
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAAA

Shiiiitt!

NURSE!!!

[Virgil]

In article <V%VZm.65165$***@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
fasgnadh <***@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

Religion in the US is losing ground, as ARIS shows:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/documents/aris030609.pdf

Also from that report,

# American Religious Identification Survey, Summary Report March 2009:
#
# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008 % Increase
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%) 15.88%
#
# Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%) 8.93%
#
# Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%) 100.30%
#
# Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%) 79.71%
#

The last column is my own appendix, but its validity is easily verified
by those whose faith does not corrupt their arithmetic, unlike both
Fasgnadh and Duke.

[fasgnadh]

Post by fasgnadh

You're a lying sack of shit, liar pedophile earl.

Of *course* he is!

Where did I say that, you LYING Piece of shit?

Right there, you lying atheist slanderer!

Are you so brain addled that you can't remember,
and so incompetent you can't find the google archive
and check for yourself?

http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/752b3249b9c03c42?hl=en&dmode=source


Now WHERE IS THE PROOF FOR THE VILE ACCUSATIONS BY YOU AND BIMBO?

Post by fasgnadh
I have never seen any evidence that Duke is a paedophile.

So why has Jimbo accused him of being one and why
has Bukakke asserted "Of *course* he is!" when NEITHER
of those lying atheist slanderers Have nay proof?

Where?

Are you blind as well as stupid and dishonest!?

RIGHT THERE! B^p


Now WHERE IS THE PROOF FOR THE VILE ACCUSATIONS BY YOU AND BIMBO?

Go ahead and post a URL or the name and date of the thread
in which I accused Dumb- Ass Duke of being a pedophile.

http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/752b3249b9c03c42?hl=en&dmode=source


Now WHERE IS THE PROOF FOR THE VILE ACCUSATIONS BY YOU AND BIMBO?

I'm waiting.

You are RANTING you evil slandering atheist bitch!


Now WHERE IS THE PROOF FOR THE VILE ACCUSATIONS BY YOU AND BIMBO?

Budikka

Post by fasgnadh
This is an extremely serious accusation and I want to know if
it refers to a past conviction, or if the atheist accusers
have presented any evidence of their claims to the police, or
if they are lying slanderers.
In the words of every atheist hypocrite on the planet;
"Where's the PROOF?"

As usual, Bukakke has none, so she snips ALL THE FACTS
and runs away like the pathetic moral and intellectual
defective she is!

Post by fasgnadh
If there is no proof the lie is actionable in almost every jurisdiction
in which USENET propagates and the damages would be well worth the legal
cost, which the atheists would have to pay.
I am sure there are numerous supporters of the Church who would
be happy to enforce the protection of innocence if the atheist
accusations are false.

Do Bimbo and Bukakke have any assets? Property? Significant
shareholdings? I know it's unlikely by Duke can take action
not just in the USA but in any jurisdiction where the deliberate
slander has been propagated!

Perhaps it would make a good test case in the lead up to the
Atheist convention next year.

Atheists cannot simply be allowed to slander others,
at the very least it is base ingratitude to the
majority religious societies which shelter them,
perhaps they would be happier in atheist Nth Korea,
where lying is the atheist states NORM! B^p

Post by fasgnadh

especially when it's a completely fabricated non-topic.

Unless you have proof, that refers to YOUR post!

Budikka

Always SNIPPING and RUNNING AWAY!

What a cowardly atheist liar and hypocrite Bukakke is!

pffffft!
--
alt.atheism FAQ:

http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com/


http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/7c0978c14fd4ed37?hl=en&dmode=source




"Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8295?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8290?context=latest


"Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:6348?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17478?context=latest


"How can you make a revolution without firing squads?"
- Lenin

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17475?context=latest

http://www.c96trading.com/Nagant_NKVD_300h.jpg


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01001/Tsar-family_1001874c.jpg

[Virgil]

In article <BHVZm.65161$***@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
fasgnadh <***@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

Faggotnuts as usual SNIPS the facts and RUNS AWAY from the TRUTH:



# American Religious Identification Survey, Summary Report March 2009:
#
# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008 % Increase
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%) 15.88%
#
# Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%) 8.93%
#
# Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%) 100.30%
#
# Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%) 79.71%
#

[Zacharias Mulletstein]

Post by fasgnadh

You're a lying sack of shit, liar pedophile earl.

Of *course* he is!

I have never seen any evidence that Duke is a paedophile.

He's a phony Christian so he'll be going to hell just the same if he was
pedophile.

[Virgil]

Post by fasgnadh
I have never seen any evidence that Duke is a paedophile.

You have never seen any evidence that there is any god either, but you
seem to have no trouble believing the latter, so why not the former as
well, ,since theists like you do not seem to wait upon evidence before
declaring beliefs.

Note that Fasgnadh also denies my percent increase addenda to the ARIS
2009 summary stats, even though simple arithmetic will verify each of
entirely them.


# American Religious Identification Survey, Summary Report March 2009:
#
# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008 % Increase
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%) 15.88%
#
# Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%) 8.93%
#
# Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%) 100.30%
#
# Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%) 79.71%

You may see the report in its entirety at
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/documents/aris030609.pdf

And it clearly shows the weakening of Religion in the USA.
#

[Paladin]

Post by fasgnadh
It is sad to see the degree to which delusional atheists are
completely out of touch with reality.
Their SpokesOrc, Virgil the forger, demonstrates the degree to
which their fragile world of fantasy is built on lies. Their belief,
based on such New Age nonsense as 'the Secret', is that if they

#

ARIS will be notified that atheists are taking their valid and
respected research and fabricating it in a demonstration of the
intellectual and moral bankruptcy that is militant atheism.
Their organisation's good name and reputation has been violated by
despicable atheist liars and their data has been massively forged
and misrepresented. The militant atheists, and especially their
chief propagandist in alt.atheism, Virgil, had better have deep
pockets because this fabrication is actionable in numerous jurisdictions;

# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008 % increase
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 34,169,000 15.88%
#
# Religious 167,254,000 182,198,000 8.93%
#
# Agnostics 991,000 1,985,000 100.30%
#
# Atheists 902,000 1,621,000 79.71%
#

As usual, the atheist propaganda machine's criminal deception omits
proper attribution, they do not want people to be able to check the
source and discover the fraud the atheists are attempting to perpetrate.
Here is the real data, properly attributed, including a link to the
primary source;
#
# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%)
#
# Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%)
#
# Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%)
#
# Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%)
0.7% of Americans!! B^D 2.3% worldwide!!! B^D
No wonder the atheists are desperate to LIE about reality with their
feeble fabrications!
EVEN THE AGNOSTICS BEAT YOU!!! **AND** they grew FASTER!!!! B^D
Atheists are a mere 4% of non-believers
..96% of non-believers explicitly reject atheism!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/documents/aris030609.pdf
Atheist liars simply can not be trusted, they are not merely immoral and
unethical defectives, but engage in criminal behaviour as has been
exposed above.

The fastest growing demographic are agnostics. Former
professed christians who are growing the huevos to just
say, "I don't know." Well, neither do you, dude.

[fasgnadh]

Post by Paladin

Post by fasgnadh
It is sad to see the degree to which delusional atheists are
completely out of touch with reality.
Their SpokesOrc, Virgil the forger, demonstrates the degree to
which their fragile world of fantasy is built on lies. Their belief,
based on such New Age nonsense as 'the Secret', is that if they

....

Post by Paladin

Post by fasgnadh
#
# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%)
#
# Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%)
#
# Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%)
#
# Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/documents/aris030609.pdf
0.7% of Americans!! B^D 2.3% worldwide!!! B^D
No wonder the atheists are desperate to LIE about reality with their
feeble fabrications!
EVEN THE AGNOSTICS BEAT YOU!!! **AND** they grew FASTER!!!! B^D

The fastest growing demographic are agnostics.

That's right, I just told you that very point!
We outnumber atheists and are growing faster than atheists! B^]

Agnosticism is the default rational position;

Atheists cannot disprove the existence of God, and it is logically
impossible to do so.
[most of them are too stupid to even understand why! B^]

Theists cannot conclusively prove the existence of God,
although it is logically possible, and there is evidence.

Post by Paladin

Post by fasgnadh
Atheists are a mere 4% of non-believers
..96% of non-believers explicitly reject atheism!

When you observe the constant lies and slanders by atheist you
understand WHY they are in relative DECLINE;

http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/da525ac2a827f467?hl=en&dmode=source

# From: fasgnadh <***@yahoo.com.au>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism,us.legal,uk.legal,aus.legal,alt.religion,
# alt.politics.republicans,uk.politics.misc,aus.politics,alt.agnosticism
# Subject: Are the atheist accusations that Duke is a paedophile true,
# or just more atheist lies and slander?
# Message-ID: <ELTZm.65131$***@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
# Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 01:22:44 GMT
#
# Budikka666 repeated the accusation of paedophilia-where's the proof?:
# > Jimbo <***@gmail.com> accused Duke of abominable crimes:
#
# >> You're a lying sack of shit, liar pedophile earl.
# >
# > Of *course* he is!
#
#
# I have never seen any evidence that Duke is a paedophile.
#
# This is an extremely serious accusation and I want to know if
# it refers to a past conviction, or if the atheist accusers
# have presented any evidence of their claims to the police, or
# if they are lying slanderers.
#
# In the words of every atheist hypocrite on the planet;
#
# "Where's the PROOF?"
#
# If there is no proof the lie is actionable in almost
# every jurisdiction in which USENET propagates and the
# damages would be well worth the legal cost, which the
# atheists would have to pay.
#
# I am sure there are numerous supporters of the Church who would
# be happy to enforce the protection of innocence if the atheist
# accusations are false.

Post by Paladin

Post by fasgnadh
Atheist liars simply can not be trusted, they are not merely immoral
and unethical defectives, but engage in criminal behaviour as has been
exposed above.

"I don't know."

Then you are an agnostic! Welcome Brother!

And your message to atheists, who believe without evidence?

Post by Paladin
Well, neither do you, dude.

And yet they wear their unproven BELIEFS and OPINIONS with blind,
ignorant, PRIDE;


http://www.thearrogantatheist.com/mensnogod.html

WHERE IS THEIR PROOF??? B^D


Atheists are LIARS who believe without PROOF!
--
alt.atheism FAQ:

http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com/


http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/7c0978c14fd4ed37?hl=en&dmode=source




"Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8295?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8290?context=latest


"Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:6348?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17478?context=latest


"How can you make a revolution without firing squads?"
- Lenin

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17475?context=latest

http://www.c96trading.com/Nagant_NKVD_300h.jpg


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01001/Tsar-family_1001874c.jpg

[Virgil]

Post by fasgnadh

It is sad to see the degree to which delusional superstitious theists are
completely out of touch with reality.

Virgil demonstrates the degree to
which their fragile world of fantasy is built on lies.

It is not a lie to say that theists merely claim the non-existence of
one fewer gods that atheists do.

And if any theist claims the non-existence of any gods other than those
of his own personal superstition, then he is quite as unable to prove
that claim as any atheist is.

Post by fasgnadh

#
# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%)
#
# Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%)
#
# Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%)
#
# Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/documents/aris030609.pdf

# American Religious Identification Survey, Summary Report March 2009:
#
# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008 % Increase
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%) 15.88%
#
# Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%) 8.93%
#
# Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%) 100.30%
#
# Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%) 79.71%
#

Post by fasgnadh
That's right, I just told you that very point!
We outnumber atheists and are growing faster than atheists!

Since Fasgnadh is actually a theist in drag (as is evidenced by his
fanatic support of theist superstitions, even in the face of their
stupidity, so is actually a THEIST himself.

I, on the other hand, am a true agnostic, a follower of T.H. Huxley, and
a non-beleiver who does not claim that gods are impossible.

Post by fasgnadh
Agnosticism is the default rational position;

Only when it is honest, which Fasgnadh's is not.
A true agnostic cannot claim to know that any particular theist beliefs
are right, since there is n proof of it.

But an agnostic can easily claim that not all of the many mutually
exclusive versions of theism can all be true.

So that until Fasgnadh can tell us WHICH of those mutually exclusive
superstitions he supports, he is waffling.

Post by fasgnadh
Atheists cannot disprove the existence of God, and it is logically
impossible to do so.

No theist can prove the existence of his gods) and simultaneously
disprove the existence of all others, so theists are in a much worse fix
than even the most doctrinaire of atheists.. [most of them are too
stupid to even understand why!

Post by fasgnadh
Theists cannot conclusively prove the non-existence of any particular God,
although it is logically possible, and there is evidence.

When you observe the constant lies and slanders by Fasgnadh you
understand WHY he is in DECLINE;

Post by fasgnadh

Theist liars simply can not be trusted, they are not merely immoral
and unethical defectives, but engage in criminal behaviour as has been
exposed above.

And your message to theists, who believe without evidence?
And yet theists wear their unproven BELIEFS and OPINIONS with blind,
ignorant, PRIDE;
WHERE IS THEIR PROOF???
Theists are LIARS who believe without PROOF!

But theists are atheists with respect to all but their own notion of
god(s) and theists only for that one, but cannot prove it either way.



# American Religious Identification Survey, Summary Report March 2009:
#
# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008 % Increase
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%) 15.88%
#
# Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%) 8.93%
#
# Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%) 100.30%
#
# Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%) 79.71%
#

Note that atheism is growing about 9 times as fast as religion in the US.

[fasgnadh]

he is quite as unable to prove that claim as any atheist is.

So you admit atheists are unable to prove their beliefs! B^D

Then this is just a statement of unproven atheist opinion,
a faith statement by atheists, utterly unprovable:

http://www.thearrogantatheist.com/mensnogod.html

No wonder agnosticism is BIGGER than Atheism and GROWING FASTER!

as Virgil shows when he cites my posts; B^]

Post by fasgnadh

#
# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%)
#
# Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%)
#
# Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%)
#
# Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/documents/aris030609.pdf

Since Virgil is actually an atheist in drag (as is evidenced by his
fanatic support of atheist superstitions like that listed above,
held dogmatically by atheists, even in the absence of evidence,
and revealing the atheist inability to MEET THE CHALLENGE to
show PROOF, he only pretends to be an agnostic!

A true agnostic rejects unproven atheist beliefs like the one Virgil
refers to above, as well as unproven theist claims.

But an agnostic speaks of what is KNOWN, and can rationally be shown,
and thus, examining the horrors of atheist states, every one of
which was a totalitarian shithole, and observing that all atheists
choose to live in MAJORITY RELIGIOUS societies rather than the
last remaining atheist state, North Korea.. it is a rational
position to conclude that even atheists think societies based
on theism are superior to atheist ones... and as a rational
agnostic I must concur.

Post by fasgnadh
Atheists cannot disprove the existence of God,
and it is logically impossible to do so.
[most of them are too stupid to even understand why! B^]
Theists cannot conclusively prove the non-existence of any particular God,
although it is logically possible, and there is evidence.

eg:

The superior civilisations based on spiritual teachings, over those in
which atheist beliefs hold sway, confirmed by the choices made by every
atheist in Usenet to LIVE in a majority religious society, is evidence,
but of course not CONCLUSIVE PROOF, of the claims of religions.

Perhaps it's a placebo effect? If you believe the universe is ordered
and meaningful and that you should be compassionate and kind.. you
become what you believe.

Either way, it clearly works, as the choices of atheists to live in
religious societies demonstrates! B^D

Even secular humanists understand that a democratic free and open
MAJORITY RELIGIOUS societies like the USA, where mention of God
can be made, are better than atheist regimes like the former USSR,
where it is prohibited and believers killed.

No one ever CHOOSES to live in an atheist state.. they were ALL dreadful
tyrannies!!! pffft!

Post by fasgnadh
And yet atheists wear their unproven BELIEFS and OPINIONS with blind,
ignorant, PRIDE;
WHERE IS THEIR PROOF???
atheists are LIARS who believe without PROOF!

And who snip and run away from the truth, and like Virgil
have to forge the posts of others, revealing the cause of atheism to be
deceptive, witless, unoriginal and derivative.

#
# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008 % Increase
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%) 15.88%
#
# Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%) 8.93%
#
# Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%) 100.30%
#
# Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%) 79.71%
#
Note that atheism is growing about 9 times as fast as religion in the US.

--
alt.atheism FAQ:

http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com/


http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/7c0978c14fd4ed37?hl=en&dmode=source




"Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8295?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8290?context=latest


"Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:6348?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17478?context=latest


"How can you make a revolution without firing squads?"
- Lenin

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17475?context=latest

http://www.c96trading.com/Nagant_NKVD_300h.jpg


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01001/Tsar-family_1001874c.jpg

[Paladin]

Post by fasgnadh

he is quite as unable to prove that claim as any atheist is.

So you admit atheists are unable to prove their beliefs! B^D
Then this is just a statement of unproven atheist opinion,
http://www.thearrogantatheist.com/mensnogod.html
No wonder agnosticism is BIGGER than Atheism and GROWING FASTER!
as Virgil shows when he cites my posts; B^]

Post by fasgnadh

#
# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%)
#
# Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%)
#
# Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%)
#
# Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/documents/aris030609.pdf

Since Virgil is actually an atheist in drag (as is evidenced by his
fanatic support of atheist superstitions like that listed above,
held dogmatically by atheists, even in the absence of evidence,
and revealing the atheist inability to MEET THE CHALLENGE to
show PROOF, he only pretends to be an agnostic!
A true agnostic rejects unproven atheist beliefs like the one Virgil
refers to above, as well as unproven theist claims.
But an agnostic speaks of what is KNOWN, and can rationally be shown,
and thus, examining the horrors of atheist states, every one of
which was a totalitarian shithole, and observing that all atheists
choose to live in MAJORITY RELIGIOUS societies rather than the
last remaining atheist state, North Korea.. it is a rational
position to conclude that even atheists think societies based
on theism are superior to atheist ones... and as a rational
agnostic I must concur.

Post by fasgnadh
Atheists cannot disprove the existence of God,
and it is logically impossible to do so.
[most of them are too stupid to even understand why! B^]
Theists cannot conclusively prove the non-existence of any particular God,
although it is logically possible, and there is evidence.

so... you're admitting that a god made us in his image.
Meaning that he too has an asshole and he shits
regularly; that he has a penis and testicles, and
therefore he pisses and impregnates his angels and poor
dumb little underage marys here on Earth.

Post by fasgnadh
The superior civilisations based on spiritual teachings, over those in
which atheist beliefs hold sway, confirmed by the choices made by every
atheist in Usenet to LIVE in a majority religious society, is evidence,
but of course not CONCLUSIVE PROOF, of the claims of religions.
Perhaps it's a placebo effect? If you believe the universe is ordered
and meaningful and that you should be compassionate and kind.. you
become what you believe.

Ordered and compassionate? As in Europe during the
Inquisition...as in Saudi Arabia, where a man can have
seven wives but a woman who is raped can be stoned to
death for "enticing" the man...as in America, where
televangelists ride in limos while ordering their
followers to oppose the most basic of human rights
(health care for all).

You fucking theists don't have a compassionate thought
in your mean little souls.

Post by fasgnadh
Either way, it clearly works, as the choices of atheists to live in
religious societies demonstrates! B^D
Even secular humanists understand that a democratic free and open
MAJORITY RELIGIOUS societies like the USA, where mention of God
can be made, are better than atheist regimes like the former USSR,
where it is prohibited and believers killed.
No one ever CHOOSES to live in an atheist state.. they were ALL dreadful
tyrannies!!! pffft!

Post by fasgnadh
And yet atheists wear their unproven BELIEFS and OPINIONS with blind,
ignorant, PRIDE;
WHERE IS THEIR PROOF???
atheists are LIARS who believe without PROOF!

careful there, bucko, your ignorance is showing.

Post by fasgnadh
And who snip and run away from the truth, and like Virgil
have to forge the posts of others, revealing the cause of atheism to be
deceptive, witless, unoriginal and derivative.

#
# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008 % Increase
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%) 15.88%
#
# Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%) 8.93%
#
# Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%) 100.30%
#
# Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%) 79.71%
#
Note that atheism is growing about 9 times as fast as religion in the US.

it's taken us a few thousand years, but people are
finally growing up.

[Virgil]

Post by fasgnadh

he is quite as unable to prove that claim as any theist is.

But most atheists do not claim the non-existences of any gods
and all theists do make such claims, about myriads of gods, excepting
only the one they believe in.

Until theists can PROVE the non-existence of those gods they do not
believe in, the have no right to bitch about anyone's lack of proof.

Post by fasgnadh
So you admit atheists are unable to prove their beliefs!

They have as much proof of gods non-existing as theists and, at most,
only claim one more.

Post by fasgnadh
Then this is just a statement of unproven atheist opinion

just like the theists statement of unproven theist opinion,

Post by fasgnadh
a faith statement by atheists, utterly unprovable

just like the faith of theists, equally utterly unprovable

Post by fasgnadh
No wonder agnosticism is BIGGER than Atheism and GROWING FASTER!

And no wonder both are growing so much faster than theism.

# American Religious Identification Survey, Summary Report March 2009:
#
# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008 % Increase
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%) 15.88%
#
# Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%) 8.93%
#
# Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%) 100.30%
#
# Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%) 79.71%
#

Post by fasgnadh
Since Virgil is actually an agnostic atheist (as is evidenced by his
fanatic support of atheist superstitions like that listed above

Actually, I do not claim that any particular god does not exist, I
merely have no belief in any one of them.

Note however, that for every god that some theist claims exists there
are other theists who claim it does not exist.

So until thiests can clean up their own house, they are wasting their
time trying to attack our impregnable position.

Post by fasgnadh
held dogmatically by a few atheists, even in the absence of evidence,

But no atheist claims the non-existence of any god which some theists
also claim does not exist.

So Fasgnadh has to clean up the theist first.

Post by fasgnadh
A true agnostic rejects unproven theist beliefs like Fasgnadh supports.
But an agnostic speaks of what is KNOWN

And for every alleged god, there are lots of theists to proclaim its
non-existence.

Post by fasgnadh

Post by fasgnadh
Theists cannot conclusively prove the non-existence of any particular God,
though for each alleged god, many of them try.

[Paladin]

Post by fasgnadh

Post by Paladin

Post by fasgnadh
It is sad to see the degree to which delusional atheists are
completely out of touch with reality.
Their SpokesOrc, Virgil the forger, demonstrates the degree to
which their fragile world of fantasy is built on lies. Their belief,
based on such New Age nonsense as 'the Secret', is that if they

....

Post by Paladin

Post by fasgnadh
#
# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%)
#
# Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%)
#
# Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%)
#
# Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/documents/aris030609.pdf
0.7% of Americans!! B^D 2.3% worldwide!!! B^D
No wonder the atheists are desperate to LIE about reality with their
feeble fabrications!
EVEN THE AGNOSTICS BEAT YOU!!! **AND** they grew FASTER!!!! B^D

The fastest growing demographic are agnostics.

That's right, I just told you that very point!
We outnumber atheists and are growing faster than atheists! B^]
Agnosticism is the default rational position;
Atheists cannot disprove the existence of God, and it is logically
impossible to do so.
[most of them are too stupid to even understand why! B^]
Theists cannot conclusively prove the existence of God,
although it is logically possible, and there is evidence.

Say what? You been talking to a burning bush again?
Tell you what, amigo: introduce me to the god that made
the god that made the god that made the god that made
the universe, and I'll bow down to each of its three heads.

Post by fasgnadh

Post by Paladin

Post by fasgnadh
Atheists are a mere 4% of non-believers
..96% of non-believers explicitly reject atheism!

horseshit. I do not reject atheism out of hand. I see
existence of a...togetherness to the Universe, as it is
fact that every atom living or dead is composed of
positive and negative charges. We can agree on that.

But for me to believe a god is in control I'd have to
accept as fact that a rock has a brain. And that, my
friend, I do emphatically reject.

Post by fasgnadh
When you observe the constant lies and slanders by atheist you
understand WHY they are in relative DECLINE;
http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/da525ac2a827f467?hl=en&dmode=source
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism,us.legal,uk.legal,aus.legal,alt.religion,
# alt.politics.republicans,uk.politics.misc,aus.politics,alt.agnosticism
# Subject: Are the atheist accusations that Duke is a paedophile true,
# or just more atheist lies and slander?
# Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 01:22:44 GMT
#
#
# >> You're a lying sack of shit, liar pedophile earl.
# >
# > Of *course* he is!
#
#
# I have never seen any evidence that Duke is a paedophile.
#
# This is an extremely serious accusation and I want to know if
# it refers to a past conviction, or if the atheist accusers
# have presented any evidence of their claims to the police, or
# if they are lying slanderers.
#
# In the words of every atheist hypocrite on the planet;
#
# "Where's the PROOF?"
#
# If there is no proof the lie is actionable in almost
# every jurisdiction in which USENET propagates and the
# damages would be well worth the legal cost, which the
# atheists would have to pay.
#
# I am sure there are numerous supporters of the Church who would
# be happy to enforce the protection of innocence if the atheist
# accusations are false.

you're full of shit.

Post by fasgnadh

Post by Paladin

Post by fasgnadh
Atheist liars simply can not be trusted, they are not merely immoral
and unethical defectives, but engage in criminal behaviour as has
been exposed above.

"I don't know."

Then you are an agnostic! Welcome Brother!
And your message to atheists, who believe without evidence?

Post by Paladin
Well, neither do you, dude.

And yet they wear their unproven BELIEFS and OPINIONS with blind,
ignorant, PRIDE;
http://www.thearrogantatheist.com/mensnogod.html
WHERE IS THEIR PROOF??? B^D
Atheists are LIARS who believe without PROOF!

You can't prove a negative, dude--and the concept of
god is itself a negative.


For the sake of argument, let's for one moment say
there is a god, and, like the bible says, we were made
in His image. Therefore: God eats, shits, pisses and
uses his penis to impregnate angels and ignorant little
underage marys here on Earth.

[B J Foster]

...

Post by fasgnadh
Atheist liars simply can not be trusted, they are not merely immoral and
unethical defectives, but engage in criminal behaviour as has been
exposed above.

Please cease cross-posting your insane rants to aus.politics, aus.legal,
uk.legal, etc

[fasgnadh]

BJ had nothing intelligent to add on the last legal issue,
merely snipping the facts and running, (a documented strategy
of militant atheists) lets see if he has anything intelligent
to add on another example of alleged slander by the atheist moral
defectives he seeks to defend;

# From: fasgnadh <***@yahoo.com.au>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism,us.legal,uk.legal,aus.legal,alt.religion,
# alt.politics.republicans,uk.politics.misc,aus.politics,alt.agnosticism
# Subject: Are the atheist accusations that Duke is a paedophile true,
# or just more atheist lies and slander?
# Message-ID: <ELTZm.65131$***@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
# Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 01:22:44 GMT
#
# Budikka666 repeated the accusation of paedophilia-where's the proof?:
# > Jimbo <***@gmail.com> accused Duke of abominable crimes:
#
# >> You're a lying sack of shit, liar pedophile earl.
# >
# > Of *course* he is!
#
#
# I have never seen any evidence that Duke is a paedophile.
#
# This is an extremely serious accusation and I want to know if
# it refers to a past conviction, or if the atheist accusers
# have presented any evidence of their claims to the police, or
# if they are lying slanderers.
#
# In the words of every atheist hypocrite on the planet;
#
# "Where's the PROOF?"
#
# If there is no proof the lie is actionable in almost
# every jurisdiction in which USENET propagates and the
# damages would be well worth the legal cost, which the
# atheists would have to pay.
#
# I am sure there are numerous supporters of the Church who would
# be happy to enforce the protection of innocence if the atheist
# accusations are false.

Post by B J Foster

Post by fasgnadh
Atheist liars simply can not be trusted, they are not merely immoral
and unethical defectives, but engage in criminal behaviour as has been
exposed above.

And other moral defectives defend them, and criticise those who
think lies and slander by atheist forgers and immoral shitpigs
should NOT be criticised, nor their illegal activities discussed

Post by B J Foster
Please cease cross-posting your insane rants to aus.politics, aus.legal,
uk.legal, etc

Usenet supports cross-posting because reality and knowledge are
holistic, not neatly divided into categories as you pretend, and
condemning the lies and slander by atheists is ON TOPIC in both
religious AND legal discussion groups.

Just because YOU have nothing intelligent to say, as usual,
does not mean that anyone is going to pay your jumpeed-up-Net-Nazi-
Martinet impersonation any serious attention other than to tell you,
in no uncertain terms;

No. Go fuck yourself. B^]



BTW, you pimply whining adolescent hypocrite, YOU crossposted
your empty bleating to us.legal and uk.politics.misc is that becasue
you hope they might pass a law defending pathetic pointless whingers
like you?
--
alt.atheism FAQ:

http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com/


http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/7c0978c14fd4ed37?hl=en&dmode=source




"Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8295?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8290?context=latest


"Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:6348?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17478?context=latest


"How can you make a revolution without firing squads?"
- Lenin

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17475?context=latest

http://www.c96trading.com/Nagant_NKVD_300h.jpg


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01001/Tsar-family_1001874c.jpg

[Virgil]

Post by fasgnadh

Post by B J Foster
Please cease cross-posting your insane rants to aus.politics, aus.legal,
uk.legal, etc

Usenet supports cross-posting because reality and knowledge are
holistic, not neatly divided into categories as you pretend, and
condemning the lies and slander of atheists is ON TOPIC in both
religious AND legal discussion groups.

But Fasgnadh's publishing of his slanders to all sorts of newsgroups
only displays his ignorance, arrogance and evil hate-mongering to a
wider audience
Just because Fasgnadh has nothing intelligent to say, as usual,
does not mean that anyone is going to fas's jumpeed-up-Net-Nazi-
Martinet impersonation any serious attention.

Theist religions thrive only in disfunctional societies, and weaken or
die out in the more functional ones, those that have STRONGLY SECULAR
DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENTS, as indicated in the rapid growth of atheism and
agnosticism in the USA:

# American Religious Identification Survey, Summary Report March 2009:
#
# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008 % Increase
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%) 15.88%
#
# Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%) 8.93%
#
# Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%) 100.30%
#
# Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%) 79.71%

See
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/documents/aris030609.pdf
#